0.05/0.09 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.05/0.10 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jrvGU4vnWP true 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 10:57:08 EDT 2024 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.10/0.30 % Running portfolio for 1440 s 0.10/0.30 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.10/0.30 % Number of cores: 8 0.10/0.31 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.10/0.31 % Running in HO mode 0.45/0.56 % Total configuration time : 828 0.45/0.56 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.45/0.56 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.45/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.45/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 0.46/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 0.46/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 0.46/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 0.46/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 0.46/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 0.46/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 0.46/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s 0.46/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s 0.46/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_old_s4.sh running for 30s 0.46/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_lifting3.sh running for 30s 84.99/11.30 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh. 84.99/11.30 % done 54 iterations in 10.588s 84.99/11.30 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 84.99/11.30 % SZS output start Refutation 84.99/11.30 thf(qML_i_type, type, qML_i: $tType). 84.99/11.30 thf(qML_mu_type, type, qML_mu: $tType). 84.99/11.30 thf(incons1389517216QML_mu_type, type, incons1389517216QML_mu: (qML_mu > 84.99/11.30 qML_i > $o) > 84.99/11.30 qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 84.99/11.30 thf(incons1905966852QML_mu_type, type, incons1905966852QML_mu: qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 84.99/11.30 thf(inconsistency_P_type, type, inconsistency_P: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > 84.99/11.30 qML_i > $o). 84.99/11.30 thf(qML_r_type, type, qML_r: qML_i > qML_i > $o). 84.99/11.30 thf(fact_0_A2, axiom, 84.99/11.30 (![W:qML_i,X:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o ),Xa:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 84.99/11.30 ( ( ( ![V:qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 ( ( qML_r @ W @ V ) => 84.99/11.30 ( ![Xb:qML_mu]: ( ( X @ Xb @ V ) => ( Xa @ Xb @ V ) ) ) ) ) & 84.99/11.30 ( inconsistency_P @ X @ W ) ) => 84.99/11.30 ( inconsistency_P @ Xa @ W ) ))). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, 84.99/11.30 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 84.99/11.30 (((((((!!) @ (^[Y3 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((qML_r @ Y0 @ 84.99/11.30 Y3) => 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ ( 84.99/11.30 ^[Y4 : qML_mu]: 84.99/11.30 (((Y1 @ Y4 @ 84.99/11.30 Y3) => 84.99/11.30 (Y2 @ Y4 @ 84.99/11.30 Y3))))))))))) & 84.99/11.30 (inconsistency_P @ Y1 @ Y0))) => 84.99/11.30 (inconsistency_P @ Y2 @ Y0))))))))))))), 84.99/11.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_0_A2])). 84.99/11.30 thf(fact_6_A4, axiom, 84.99/11.30 (![W:qML_i,X:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 84.99/11.30 ( ( inconsistency_P @ X @ W ) => 84.99/11.30 ( ![V2:qML_i]: ( ( qML_r @ W @ V2 ) => ( inconsistency_P @ X @ V2 ) ) ) ))). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, 84.99/11.30 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 84.99/11.30 (((inconsistency_P @ Y1 @ Y0) => 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((qML_r @ Y0 @ Y2) => 84.99/11.30 (inconsistency_P @ Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))))), 84.99/11.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_6_A4])). 84.99/11.30 thf(fact_3_A1a, axiom, 84.99/11.30 (![W:qML_i,X:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 84.99/11.30 ( ( inconsistency_P @ ( ^[Y:qML_mu,Z:qML_i]: ( ~( X @ Y @ Z ) ) ) @ W ) => 84.99/11.30 ( ~( inconsistency_P @ X @ W ) ) ))). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, 84.99/11.30 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 84.99/11.30 (((inconsistency_P @ 84.99/11.30 (^[Y2 : qML_mu,Y3 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((~) @ (Y1 @ Y2 @ Y3)))) @ 84.99/11.30 Y0) => (((~) @ (inconsistency_P @ Y1 @ Y0)))))))))))), 84.99/11.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_3_A1a])). 84.99/11.30 thf(fact_1_A5, axiom, 84.99/11.30 (![X_1:qML_i]: ( inconsistency_P @ incons1905966852QML_mu @ X_1 ))). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, 84.99/11.30 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (inconsistency_P @ incons1905966852QML_mu @ Y0))))), 84.99/11.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_1_A5])). 84.99/11.30 thf(fact_9_ref, axiom, (![X3:qML_i]: ( qML_r @ X3 @ X3 ))). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain, 84.99/11.30 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: (qML_r @ Y0 @ Y0))))), 84.99/11.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_9_ref])). 84.99/11.30 thf(fact_8_QML__S5_Osym, axiom, 84.99/11.30 (![X3:qML_i,Y2:qML_i]: ( ( qML_r @ X3 @ Y2 ) => ( qML_r @ Y2 @ X3 ) ))). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, 84.99/11.30 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((qML_r @ Y0 @ Y1) => (qML_r @ Y1 @ Y0)))))))))), 84.99/11.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_8_QML__S5_Osym])). 84.99/11.30 thf(fact_10_NE__def, axiom, 84.99/11.30 (( incons1905966852QML_mu ) = 84.99/11.30 ( ^[X2:qML_mu,W2:qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 ( ![Y:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 84.99/11.30 ( ( incons1389517216QML_mu @ Y @ X2 @ W2 ) => 84.99/11.30 ( ![V3:qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 ( ( qML_r @ W2 @ V3 ) => ( ?[Z:qML_mu]: ( Y @ Z @ V3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 84.99/11.30 (((incons1905966852QML_mu) 84.99/11.30 = ((^[Y0 : qML_mu,Y1 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 84.99/11.30 (((incons1389517216QML_mu @ Y2 @ Y0 @ Y1) => 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((qML_r @ Y1 @ Y3) => 84.99/11.30 (((??) @ (^[Y4 : qML_mu]: 84.99/11.30 (Y2 @ Y4 @ Y3)))))))))))))))))), 84.99/11.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_10_NE__def])). 84.99/11.30 thf(fact_11_ess__def, axiom, 84.99/11.30 (( incons1389517216QML_mu ) = 84.99/11.30 ( ^[Phi:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o ),X2:qML_mu,W2:qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 ( ![Y:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 84.99/11.30 ( ( Y @ X2 @ W2 ) => 84.99/11.30 ( ![V3:qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 ( ( qML_r @ W2 @ V3 ) => 84.99/11.30 ( ![Z:qML_mu]: ( ( Phi @ Z @ V3 ) => ( Y @ Z @ V3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, 84.99/11.30 (((incons1389517216QML_mu) 84.99/11.30 = ((^[Y0 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o,Y1 : qML_mu,Y2 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 84.99/11.30 (((Y3 @ Y1 @ Y2) => 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y4 : qML_i]: 84.99/11.30 (((qML_r @ Y2 @ Y4) => 84.99/11.30 (((!!) @ (^[Y5 : qML_mu]: 84.99/11.30 (((Y0 @ Y5 @ Y4) => 84.99/11.30 (Y3 @ Y5 @ Y4)))))))))))))))))))), 84.99/11.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_11_ess__def])). 84.99/11.30 thf(zip_derived_cl1778, plain, ($false), 84.99/11.30 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], 84.99/11.30 [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl5, 84.99/11.30 zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl26, zip_derived_cl12, 84.99/11.30 zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])). 84.99/11.30 84.99/11.30 % SZS output end Refutation 84.99/11.30 84.99/11.30 84.99/11.30 % Terminating... 85.58/11.41 % Runner terminated. 85.58/11.42 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 85.58/11.42 EOF